M. Andreeva
To Win
M. Frech
To Win
Martina Trevisan vs Magdalena Frech Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L L L L W W L
Form
L W L L L L L W L WHead-2-Head: Trevisan 2 - 0 Frech
They have played 6 sets in total, with Trevisan winning 4 and Frech winning 2. The last match between Trevisan and Frech was at the Hong Kong Tennis Open - Hong Kong, 12-10-2023, Second, Hard with Martina Trevisan getting the victory 6-3 6-7(4) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Martina Trevisan | 2 |
| Magdalena Frech | 0 |
Hong Kong Tennis Open - Hong Kong(12-10-2023)
6
3
6
7
6
3
| Trevisan | Stats | Frech |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (5-10) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 157 | Ranking | 27 |
| 18 | Highest Rank | 22 |
| 31 | Age | 27 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 8 |
| 58% (312-222) | Career Total W/L | 59% (438-306) |
| $2,243,283 | Career Prize Money | $2,155,352 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 |
Stats 
Martina Trevisan
Player
Magdalena Frech
69%
(
82 of
119)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
50 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
103
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
| 6-2 6-7(6) 6-0 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Magdalena Frech
56%
(
52 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
5
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
63%
(
26 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
107
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 36 | Games Won | 22 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 11 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:30:7 | Average Match Time | 2:30:7 |
| 63% (134/212) | 1st Serve % | 61% (108/176) |
| 65% (87/134) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (58/108) |
| 54% (42/78) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (37/68) |
| 63% (12/19) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 31% (5/16) |
| 46% (81/176) | Return Points Win % | 39% (83/212) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Martina Trevisan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Martina Trevisan
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Anna Bondar
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Wushuang Zheng
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yexin Ma
Player
Martina Trevisan
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
1-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Martina Trevisan
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
76%
(
51 of
67)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Martina Trevisan
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taylor Townsend
Player
Martina Trevisan
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
15
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Martina Trevisan
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
34 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Renata Zarazua
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
76%
(
53 of
70)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Caroline Dolehide
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Magdalena Frech Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
54%
(
66 of
123)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
106)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
51%
(
29 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
44%
(
54 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
50 of
106)
119
Total Points Won
110
|
5-7 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Magdalena Frech
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Sara Errani
64%
(
76 of
119)
1st Serve %
83%
(
99 of
120)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
57 of
99)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
48 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
50 of
120)
121
Total Points Won
118
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Magdalena Frech
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucia Bronzetti
Player
Magdalena Frech
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Magdalena Frech
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diana Shnaider
Player
Magdalena Frech
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Magda Linette
Player
Magdalena Frech
69%
(
72 of
105)
1st Serve %
62%
(
73 of
118)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
44 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
52 of
118)
113
Total Points Won
110
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
52 of
111)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Magdalena Frech
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (312/222) | Win/Loss | 59% (438/306) |
| 57% (698/537) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (985/758) |
| 53% (5981/5278) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (8506/7558) |
| 47% (66/75) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (162/121) |
| 66% (231/119) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (164/111) |
| 45% (14/17) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (74/48) |
| 8% (1/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 59% (38/26) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 304 | Aces Total | 1317 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1614 | Total Double Faults | 1397 |
| 1:27:55 | Average Match Time | 1:20:30 |
| 414.09 | Average Opponent Rank | 409.66 |
| 66% (20428/31020) | 1st Serve % | 62% (25680/41334) |
| 59% (12132/20428) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (16181/25680) |
| 45% (4785/10592) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (7199/15654) |
| 49% (1940/3930) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (2406/5172) |
| 47% (14403/30732) | Return Points Win % | 45% (18640/41037) |
| 54% (32/27) | Slam W/L | 46% (22/26) |
| 38% (21/35) | Masters W/L | 55% (45/37) |
| 60% (6/4) | Cups W/L | 50% (7/7) |
| 42% (46/64) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (93/91) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (158/78) | Challenger W/L | 65% (224/118) |
| 78% (49/14) | Futures W/L | 64% (47/27) |
| 59% (310/527) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (428/734) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (4/4) |
| 54% (55/102) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (68/147) |
| 56% (97/172) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (142/258) |
| 86% (296/256) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (400/352) |
| 13% (296/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (400/47) |
| 24% (238/56) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (344/85) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
